Learn how enVista helped American Freight Furniture leverage a single Unified CommerceCloud Platform to optimize their customer experience.
Are You Accounting for Fuel Surcharges in Your Parcel Budget?
Reading Time: 3 minutes
As everyone knows, the price of fuel has been, and will likely continue to be, on the rise. The increases/fluctuations in jet fuel and highway diesel prices contribute to more than just carriers’ fuel tables. Back in February 2017, the fuel table calculations were changed from monthly to weekly. This allowed for fluctuations in surcharges due to the volatile fuel prices. Both major carriers (FedEx and UPS) have specific “bands” that connect ranges of fuel prices with a surcharge percentage. Similar to how we see fluctuation in gas prices, these bands allow for fluctuations without seeing skyrocketing costs for their customers. However, the beauty of these bands for both small parcel carriers is that even with the volatile fuel prices, they won’t take a hit to their bottom lines.
Both major small parcel carriers calculate the fuel surcharge percentage based on the national average fuel price published by the US Energy Information Administrations from two weeks prior, which means there is a lag between the index and the carriers’ fuel surcharges. This year alone, the major carriers have collectively raised rates numerous times. Fuel is typically evaluated on the net package charge plus any transportation related charges/surcharges. Each carrier has separate accessorials that get factored into the calculation as well. See the tables below for perspective on the carriers and their applicable accessorials.
FedEx and UPS tend to stay hand in hand with their surcharges for both Express and Ground. As one goes up, so does the other. The variance between the two is consistent within a percentage point.
So, what does all this mean when it comes to calculating fuel and savings to the bottom line?
Let’s Take a Hypothetical Situation
Say we have a Ground package that is 50 pounds, Zone 8, list rate $90.00, with a residential accessorial of $3.75 and a delivery area surcharge of $4.25. The shipper has a 20% base package discount, no discounts on accessorials, and has a 10% discount on fuel. The Fuel Surcharge percentage for this package is 6.25%.
The basic calculation is (Net Freight + Applicable Accessorials) X Fuel Surcharge %. With the above information:
$90.00 (list rate)
– $18.00 (base package discount)
$72.00 (net freight)
+ $3.75 (residential surcharge)
+ $4.25 (delivery area surcharge)
$80.00 x 6.25% = $5.00 (gross fuel surcharge)
Now we need to take the discount of 10% off the $5.00- $0.50 = $4.50. The total cost of the package is now $84.50 (net freight + accessorials + net fuel surcharge).
Now that you know a little more about how fuel is calculated, what can YOU do?
Review your current small parcel carrier contracts and the discounts currently listed.
Negotiate discounts not only on fuel, but transportation related accessorials and net freight discounts to reduce the overall impact.
Evaluate a multi-carrier strategy or evaluate a single source with extra volume discounts.
Be informed about carrier changes.
>UPS already increased their Ground FSC indices by 50 points in June. In October, both Domestic Air and Ground went up 25 points again.
>FedEx already increased their domestic air indices by 75 points in September AND made changes to import and export to mirror UPS’ pricing.
>Will the carriers increase the indices by the time the GRI rolls around? My suspicion is they will reduce fuel, increase transportation charges, and level out the GRI.
Kaitlyn Parsons is a Manager of Parcel Audit at enVista and is responsible for preparing audit metrics both internally and externally, in addition to overseeing the analyst team responsible for auditing billions of dollars in enVista’s customers’ small-parcel spend. Prior to her role as manager, she held various positions at enVista, including transportation analyst and parcel audit and team lead.
Cold Storage Evolves to Meet Global Demands
Reading Time: 2 minutes
Despite the disparate levels of sophistication between cold chains in developed markets versus those in emerging ones, the common goals are generally the same: maintain food safety standards and protect brand reputation, reduce operating costs, and keep pace with changing consumer demands, which includes online grocery shopping and home delivery.
The cold storage sector is tasked with meeting all of these requirements, which is driving significant changes across the board.
Taking a Global View
Emergent Cold, a newer cold storage provider that was founded by industry veterans, operates facilities in both developed markets, such as Australia and New Zealand, as well as emerging ones like Vietnam. This gives the company a unique view into the global cold chain.
In emerging markets, the lack of infrastructure is one of the biggest challenges for the food industry, says chief operations officer West Hutchison.
“There are a lot of markets around the world that have no temperature-controlled infrastructure at all,” he says, or they are “mom-and-pop companies that maybe don’t have some of the design experience and security systems in place from a physical facility perspective or IT perspective.”
While the construction of the physical infrastructure is underway, Emergent is working with enVista, a global consulting and software solutions firm, to build an overall IT suite that ensures it will be able to track-and-trace products that are in its care custody and control.
While regulations in the United States require the capture of “one up and one down traceability,” so that if there’s a request for that data, the appropriate party can respond, in New Zealand, the regulations are even more stringent, notes Hutchison. In particular, the data must be “pushed” to regulators.
These variances in both the physical infrastructure and country-specific regulations make it a necessity to implement a robust and comprehensive IT solution that can be applied globally. It also provides a foundation for continued growth across multiple global regions.
Different Markets, Different Labor Issues
Mike Rader, managing partner at enVista, notes that labor issues are also different in emerging markets like Vietnam compared to developed markets.
For example, the adoption of technology lags, in part, because it’s simply cheaper to hire people and maintain paper-intensive processes.
“It’s going to be interesting to see how receptive they are as we roll out technology solutions in emerging markets, especially Vietnam,” he says.
In many developed markets, though, labor availability is tight, and attracting workers to the cold storage sector can be even tougher, given the generally harsh environment.
According to Hutchison, Emergent’s philosophy is “to have fewer, but more highly compensated associates, through a blend of automation and performance-based pay packages.
“As we look at our facilities, there are a lot of opportunities for automation. AS/RS facilities have been around forever, but they are getting a lot more capable of performing lower-level tasks such as layer picking and case picking,” he says, adding that even the use of automated guided vehicles (AGVs) can have a positive impact in a tight labor market
Change Management is Key to Fully Realizing Supply Chain Project ROI
On average, 75% of supply chain execution project benefits and ROI are dependent on employees fully adopting change.
enVista to Share Thought Leadership on Unifying Commerce and Supply Chain at NEECOM
enVista announces that it will lead an educational session on improving supply chain operations and satisfying the end consumer at NEECOM.
enVista Hires OMS Veteran Suneel Krishnaswamy to Lead Software Development Across All Commerce Software Offerings
enVista announces that Suneel Krishnaswamy has joined as CTO to lead development and product direction for all enVista software.